Citations
S.L. Cox et al. Socio-cultural practices may have affected sex differences in stature in Early Neolithic Europe. Nature Human Behaviour.February 2024. doi:10.1038/s41562-023-01756-w.
K. Thompson, F. Portrait and L. Schoonmade. The height premium: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Economics & Human Biology.Vol. 50, August 2023, 101273, doi: 10.1016/j.ehb.2023.101273.
B. Bogin. Social-economic-political-emotional (SEPE) factors regulate human growth. Human Biology and Public Health.Vol. 1, June 22, 2021. doi: 10.52905/hbph.v1.10.
C. Scheffler et al.Stunting as a synonym of social disadvantage and poor parental education. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.Vol. 18, February 2021, p. 1350. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18031350.
R. Branconi et al. Ecological and social constraints combine to promote evolution of non-breeding strategies in clownfish. Communications Biology. Published online November 6, 2020. doi: 10.1038/s42003-020-01380-8.
C. Scheffler et al. Stunting is not a synonym of malnutrition. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition.Vol. 74, March 1, 2020, p. 377. doi: 10.1038/s41430-019-0439-4.
P.K. Bird et al.Income inequality and social gradients in children’s height: comparison of cohort studies from five high-income countries. BMJ Paediatrics Open.Published online November 28, 2019. doi: 10.1136/ bmjpo-2019-000568.
S. Jayachandran and R. Pande. Why are Indian children so short? The role of birth order and son preference. American Economic Review.Vol. 107, September 2017, p. 2600. doi: 10.1257/aer.20151282.
E. Huchard et al. Competitive growth in a cooperative mammal. Nature.Vol. 533, May 26, 2016, p. 532, doi: 10.1038/nature17986.
M. Hermanussen et al. The impact of physical connectedness on body height in Swiss conscripts. Anthropologischer Anzeiger.Vol. 71, November 1, 2014, p. 313. doi: 10.1127/0003-5548/2014/0466.
P. Buston. Size and growth modification in clownfish. Nature. Vol. 424, July 10, 2003, p. 145. doi: 10.1038/424145a.