At the World Economic Forum in Davos, Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang made a simple but provocative point. He said artificial intelligence is more likely to increase the value of blue-collar work. The idea itself is not new. What makes it interesting is how directly it challenges a long-standing belief about how people advance in their careers.
Historically, the usual path to senior leadership meant starting close to the work, often in hands-on roles. Advancement usually meant moving into offices, meetings, spreadsheets, and management layers. The closer you got to the top, the farther you were from the physical work that kept the business running.
Early conversations about AI followed a similar script. Most of the attention went to office jobs, knowledge work, and desk-based tasks. Meanwhile, the people running factories, warehouses, power systems, and data centers were rarely part of the discussion, even though those systems remained essential.
That is where the idea of the “new blue collar” comes in. The term describes jobs that combine hands-on work with digital and AI tools. These include technicians who keep data centers online, workers who operate advanced manufacturing equipment, and crews who manage energy and infrastructure systems that AI depends on. These roles sit where software meets the real world. They are hard to automate, expensive to replace, and critical when something goes wrong.
It is still unclear how long this shift will last. Robots and automation may eventually take on more physical tasks, and hiring surges around infrastructure projects may slow. But even if the change is temporary, it can still affect who gets ahead. When companies care more about who can keep complex systems running, they tend to promote and trust different people.
That does not mean future CEOs will come solely from the trades. It does mean that knowing how things actually work may matter more than it used to. Leaders who understand how power is delivered, how equipment fails, how safety issues arise, and what causes systems to break under pressure are often better at judging whether a business can expand without constraint problems.
For people thinking about their own careers, the message is not to switch jobs but to pay attention to where influence is forming. If Huang’s prediction proves correct, success may depend less on abstract ideas and more on who knows how to make things work in the real world.
Check out 2025’s most powerful rising executives in the Fortune 500
Ruth Umoh
ruth.umoh@fortune.com
Smarter in seconds
Orderly exit. What Walmart’s CEO succession reveals about the smartest time to exit
Cultural fluency. Meet TikTok’s new U.S. CEO: Adam Presser, a Harvard business and law grad with an affinity for Chinese movies
Leadership lesson
Blackstone CEO Steve Schwarzman on ruthless focus and knowing when to go all in: “Just because something can work doesn’t mean you should necessarily do it because then you’re diverted, and you can’t focus on the thing that’s astonishing.”
News to know
Silicon Valley leaders blasted the fatal Minneapolis shooting by federal immigration agents and warned that similar enforcement tactics could soon spread to the Bay Area. Fortune
David Sokol, once viewed as Warren Buffett’s likely successor, saw his path to leading Berkshire Hathaway derailed by a controversy over his personal stock trades. WSJ
EU regulators have launched an investigation into Elon Musk’s X over alleged failures to curb the spread of AI-generated sexualized images. NYT
Walmart’s promotion of its e-commerce chief to run U.S. operations highlights its increasingly tech-first pivot. Fortune
Donald Trump warned he would slap 100% tariffs on Canada if it reached a trade deal with China. FT
The ICE enforcement standoff in Minneapolis is forcing companies like Hilton and Target to rethink how they respond to controversial immigration actions. WSJ
Trump’s second term is marked by dealmaking and unpredictability that are reshaping business and government. Fortune
Trump is pushing U.S. investment in Venezuela’s oil sector, but sanctions make it hard for companies to assess opportunities there. NYT